Wednesday, July 12, 2023

LTA: GamingMagic13

 For those in the know about him, in the event he does anything irredeemable, or is tied to anything more salacious than poor conduct, I will retract what I say in this post and it will be promptly removed. Whatever I say is based on what is already known.

GamingMagic13 is a content reviewer perhaps most infamous for doing an overly long review of Toy Story 4, regardless of whether the film is good or bad, along with some pretty poor takes and how he handled them, these occurring throughout the previous year for better or worse. I first heard of GamingMagic13 through a review and let’s play he did of Dragon’s Lair 3D. Not gonna lie, it’s a great game, dead ass, and it was cool that it was getting such dedicated exposure.

I didn’t know about the worst of him until well after, and even then all I heard was stabs at Trevor (GM13) in passing. He seems like quite the head case... although I don't think he's down for the count just yet.

Yes I am aware he made a six consecutive hour rant on Toy Story 4, yes I’m aware he is far from respectful on different opinions, yes I’m aware of his bad takes, yes I’m aware things can get repetitive in his longer reviews and absolutely angry, but who hasn't at some point on YouTube? When you're passionate about something it would blur your better judgement because you put your all into expressing it, you felt strongly about this and it'd be harder to hear others out because you'd believe they don't see what you have. Not saying that as a defense, but to hopefully give you an idea on why shit like this happens. In a word, it's pride.

Trevor, for better or worse, is clearly passionate about the movies he covers, and to his credit the movies he reviewed where his shit hit the fan rode off of existing properties and thus had a lot that needed to be addressed, at least in principle. If he was just raging about a movie that exists in isolation with no connection to anything then fine, I see your point. He nitpicks, and there're times it's not necessary, but in a way nitpicking can help reinforce your argument if you have one. I can imagine most movies he covers could improve based on his claims, indirectly though, like what he said about Bo Peep. He goes on and on about her, and I'd think, yeah, it would be interesting to see what traits she would take up after being separated from the other toys, but the movie bungled that by having her pick up those traits before she was taken away.

I mean it makes more sense than applying the continuity of Toy Story shorts to the movie. Other than that, he has a point, but most of the time he goes about expressing that point the wrong way. You say gaslighting, I say they didn't want a particularly feminine female demonstrating that much weakness.

So, not being respectful of other opinions being rooted in passion and pride, going into the crux of his review style, but what about the length? Let me say this, Trevor isn't the only one guilty of this. Not everything can be summed up on a surface level, especially when most things ride off the back of many long past, or have endeared for so long, there needs to be context, arguments, and a demonstration of apt in your research. Either TikTok killed everyone's attention spans or review culture is starting to become worse than it already is.

Now for his hot takes. He considers games like Sonic Heroes and Mario 64 to be shit, apply the pride argument here. I'd be a hypocrite for calling him out because, let's face it, I enjoy a lot of stuff that is outright rejected by the public, Trevor hates most of what is loved by the public, including me, I even had a collection of written posts to that effect bashing Teen Titans, I'd have no leg to stand on.

There's also the matter of how old he is. Apparently he began his YouTube career in 2014 at the age of 11, with a let's play of an Indiana Jones game. The Toy Story 4 videos and those he makes his hot video game takes came out last year. Do the math, he would've been around 19 or 20 when he made those videos. Now, why am I going this route? Buckle up, bear with me. You mature physically at that age, but do you mature mentally? Let me refer to the concept of a 90s hangover. A 90s hangover is used to describe how elements of the prior decade bled into the early-2000s, certain shows coming out in the last leg of that decade kept going, certain fashions, trends and bands were still wildly popular, etc.

Where the hell am I going with this? It's sorta like when you enter your adult years. You just get right into it physically, but you still embody traits of your younger years. You don't become entirely mature mentally because you've yet to experience the full rigors of adult hood. When you're 18, you still have to go to school, college to be exact, and most of the time college students are just embracing their full transitions into maturity without much critical thought to match. For all we know, Trevor lacked much critical thought when going into his videos, still taking traits of what he was when he was younger. It's usually around 21 or 22 that you gradually mature mentally, as you take on the rigors of adulthood, you had finished college or are in your senior year, and you take on new responsibilities.

Okay, if you don't buy that, how about this? At least he wasn't 30 when he made those videos, that would've been far more pathetic frankly and I'd be siding against him in that regard, make no mistake.

But, back to Toy Story 4, let's be real, it's not that good of a movie, honestly I'd say it's hardly good at all. I've seen part of the first Toy Story, but I've seen all of Toy Story 2 and 3, and when I heard of Toy Story 4, frankly I was bewildered it actually existed. So, in Trevor's defense he's not going after a beloved movie, but he just went about it in the worst way.

Now, there's the matter of him taking a cartoon too seriously and getting angry over it. Yes that's a fair argument to make, but honestly I find stuff like that more entertaining. They may just be playing up the anger for laughs, of course there's always that one guy saying AVGN did it better because he can do no wrong and he always needs to be held high enough to sniff god's anus- see what I mean on hypocrisy? Honestly, cartoon reviewers that want to be taken seriously, and go into dramatic breakdowns is far more pathetic because it's clear they take cartoons too seriously enough for them to imply it hurts them on a mental level, against what seems to be a throwback to the days of angry reviewing. Pick your poison.

By the end, at his best, Trevor is passionate about the movies he covers, a little too passionate, and unable to keep his mouth shut on stuff that could come back to bite him, but who knows? Maybe he'll learn to be better about it. There're small glimmers of him being a bit respectful, but that's just what I've seen.

https://sta.sh/064vd77yoxw

For now, Trevor isn't the only controversial YouTuber I like, and as long as he hasn't done anything like dox or groom someone, and as he's technically young if my mental maturity theory holds water, he's not down for the count just yet, and he has managed to maintain respectable ratios on his videos, well his Toy Story 4 master post managed to keep one, I haven't seen the individual videos to know just for the record.

If you're not into GamingMagic13, more power to you, I can understand why, but that's just my business.

Tuesday, July 11, 2023

LTA: Hollow Sacrifices

In life, we all get to a point where we have to give something up for the better of the world or ourselves. The directions we take are determined by our circumstances, do we want to return to the way things were, or do we take an opportunity to change? Sometimes the latter is the best option, but other times it isn't if we put some thought into it.

I'm of course referring to what occurs in film and on television. I've had this feeling for the longest time, but I never had many examples to refer to until now. So let's get into it. Firstly, let me better explain what I mean by these sacrifices. A character is forced into a role they didn't want, whether it was because of an act of malice, by total accident or whatever. They spend a majority of the film or show trying to undo what happened to them, but then, something happens that make them do a total 180.

I can't confirm where this truly began, or if it happened here first, but this is popular enough to serve as a key example. This act of self-sacrifice can be traced back to 2001's Shrek, itself intended to act as a subversion or commentary on fairy tales, and commercialism, with the crux of it being that the big stupid ugly ogre is the hero, while the brave prince is a phony, also evil, and through true love's first kiss, Princess Fiona would take the form of the other end. This was through a curse that transforms her into an ogre at night, and because Shrek demonstrated he loved her and vice versa, she would become an ogre, fair trade.

I bring Shrek up because it feels like most other movies try to follow that kind of arc, or just take the basic principle, not helping that the examples I bring up happened to come after Shrek. First example, Brother Bear. Kenai became a bear after killing one in cold blood, then by the end of it he never regains his humanity in spite of finishing his arc. You may say the impact, if there would be one, wouldn't be as strong if Kenai regained his humanity, well what impact does him remaining a bear have? It's like a level above purgatory, frankly.

Second example, Monsters Vs. Aliens. Susan's entire arc really rubs me the wrong way. I get it, her old normal life wasn't that great, and it took a lot of adjusting to get into the role of Ginormica. But what really taints her arc is that rather than applying what she has learned as Ginormica, you know, more confidence, bravery, the like, she decides, fuck it, she will remain where she was as if that's meant to reflect any growth, it just felt so... off. It's like they had each character resign to their fate rather than have the desire to take what they've learned and apply it to their old lives.

Of course no one would ever be the same after going through journeys like Brother Bear or Monsters Vs. Aliens, but there's a fine line between leaving the journey, and keeping it going. If there is any meaning behind those, I don't see it. I do however, see a reason why these things went the way they did. They turned out the way they did for the sake of having the means to push the films further.

It's like this. Brother Bear got a sequel. Monsters Vs. Aliens got an animated series. If either Kenai or Susan returned to normal by the end of their respective movies, now how the hell could there be a sequel in any form? Lose the characters, lose a key component, and thus, lose any chance at making some extra cash, and remember, it's Disney, they've been dishing out sequels for years, and DreamWorks had every intent of also getting money for their stuff.

In other words, Shrek may've inspired other movie makers to try and capitalize on what made Shrek good in subtle ways, while ensuring they could get as much as they could out of their movies.

It's a bit like dysfunctional families, what started as a simple subversion turned into the norm for a lot of movies. But hey, repetitive outcomes aren't always the end of the world as long as the stories justify them, like Pinocchio. It's like this, what if Pinocchio opted to remain a puppet, foregoing his own struggles- oh wait the live-action remake of Pinocchio kinda implied that.

Oh what if in The Jungle Book Mowgli never returned to the Man Village- yeah live-action remake.

Or what about what if Beauty and the Beast, Beast never became human again? He had resigned himself to his curse in spite of finding love, and yes, he does let Beauty go, but that's a sign of genuine love on his part to her, and yes he gets brought back to normal by the end of it. He grew as a character, and met the terms of the curse laid before him. If he remained a beast, then it would ruin the whole point of the story, otherwise you'd just have the Beast languish in his castle in loneliness, which he would die of.

The Emperor's New Groove, Kuzco turned into a llama per the plot of Yzma, Kuzco, initially a selfish ruler, grew humble overtime, and he got to return to normal and mend the wounds he had caused. More of a demonstration of how one can grow in spite of doing wrong, of course what good would still being a llama do? Then again it never stopped the movie from getting a sequel and series adaptation.

Brave, in spite of what people feel about that film. What if Queen Elinor remained a bear for the rest of her life? The kingdom would be in chaos or some shit, and Merida would never, ever, develop as a character, at least any more than the film would've allowed. 

Referring back to Brother Bear and Monsters Vs. Aliens, I reaffirm that them returning to normal would be of no consequence. They would take what they have learned and apply it, Kenai learning to think his actions through and be a better person, Susan becoming more confident and able to tackle her dull life head on.

Those may seem like expected conclusions, but... what makes what actually happened any better? The points in favor of those seem minor by comparison. The only thing in favor of Kenai remaining a bear is to remain a companion to Koda, that's it. I have a crazy idea to how Brother Bear could've turned out, but it's gonna derail this post. The things in favor of Susan remaining Ginormica... are little to none, just appreciating the new company? Typical. Liking what the size gave her? Who says they have to feel big both mentally and physically? In fact, it seems like Susan has hardly developed, too afraid to return to her old life, so she sticks with the new one she was forced to take.

Otherwise why have her be eager to marry that man? If she was forced into it then I could kinda understand. If there's a greater meaning behind it, please tell me.

So to sum up, I can forgive characters turning back on their development, at least implacably, but there has to be something to back it up, give it greater meaning, and of course make sense. A radical shift in a character's personality can justify a predictable conclusion, but either Shrek wound up giving filmmakers the wrong idea, or they want desperately to milk a movie for however much it's worth.

Friday, July 7, 2023

Episode Review: Haunted (Teen Titans)

Of all the episodes of Teen Titans, I honestly consider Haunted to be an absolute disappointment. I know, a series that ended with Things Change, and that's not even close for me. I had reviewed this a while back, so why am I doing it again? Well, since then I've found examples of shows that incorporated ideas that I felt represented what I expected of this episode.

When it comes to Teen Titans, high expectations are had for it by default, because people put it on a pedestal. I don't want to go into the role it had in one of the more exhausting eras in cartoon history, because we all should know by now, but sufficed to say it lost a lot of good will with me. The show isn't terrible, but it isn't as great as it's poised to be, whether that label is forced on it or not. If a series takes itself seriously enough, typically it makes it easier to dissect it.

Now, Haunted, as a kid I thought it was an interesting episode in spite of not seeing the full context of it. Realizing the context after seeing it another time, okay fine, still not bad, now seeing other episodes to compare it to and realizing that Teen Titans has gone through a constant identity crisis and wasn't as daring as it was implied to be... this has to be the worst episode of the show I've seen, bar none.

The Episode

When going into why this episode proved to be a disappointment, it's important I briefly discuss the dynamic between the lead character Robin and often overarching villain Slade. Compared to others, Robin was deadset on exposing Slade, for the mystery I guess. The comics hold no grasp here because half the time the cartoon adaptations take liberties. Too bad the killer of Robin's parents (in Teen Titans it's confirmed that this iteration of Robin is Dick Grayson), and Slade are canonically different.

If there was a greater meaning behind Robin and Slade, I forgot all about it honestly. But I do remember Robin's focus on Slade slowly developed into obsession... and by the end of certain arcs things just happen to return to normal. Case in point, war with Trigon, an entire apocalypse is thwarted, and it's back to the 9 to 5, like an example of how the status quo of god can be a negative. Not to say Teen Titans doesn't have a serialized elements, it's just specific to a certain arc of episodes or individual characters.

I bring that up because this episode marks a point when Slade had been gone for a long while and Robin believes otherwise under suspicion of a grander plan being underway. Now, to go over Robin's obsession with Slade, it prompted him to don the vigilante persona Red X so he could hopefully get closer to the source, not the evil alien tofu, but, you know. There is a giveaway to what'll drive the episode herein, but I'm not gonna reveal it because that's gonna be crucial to the end.

For someone obsessed with a villain, it's fair to expect Robin to become a bit more paranoid, especially for a villain otherwise shrouded in mystery. Something like this you'd expect delusions of an ongoing plot, visions, being pitted against your friends under suspicion they're gonna heel-turn. Sure it's expected, but has a good impact when it's happening to someone with a strong moral compass, showing anyone can crack at anytime.

We get the first scenario, well, about 60/40. Slade does show up with a master plan, and cracks slowly begin to form. To sum up, Slade set up earthquake generators, it turns out there aren't any, Robin and Starfire confront Slade but Starfire claims she didn't see him, and Beast Boy has a cold. If it's not obvious, they rushed to establish something was wrong, and thus the mystery that could've been had was immediately suspended. The best way to keep people on their toes is to show that something that seems impossible has a kernel of truth. Perhaps have Slade claim that these generators are invisible to the naked eye maybe.

But what's wrong with Beast Boy, well aside from being sick? It's a case of comic relief where it isn't necessary. We all know the principle of comic relief, to relieve tension in a dark or dire story, which Haunted is poised to be. The problem, this episode isn't dark or dire, at least at first, or if you already figured out something was wrong and are just waiting for the bombshell to be dropped further than it has already.

Okay, maybe it's just a small oversight, it's early into the episode and maybe they wouldn't think kids would notice, which is kinda ironic since many fans of Teen Titans advocate cartoons aren't just for kids, but still, maybe one of the head writers had to go to the hospital or something and the rest scrambled to meet the deadline or get rid of that one script occupying the bottom desk drawer.

Things begin to crumble further when Robin confronts Slade in that old factory location he used to inhabit, and it is here this episode begins to lose me. If it wasn't already obvious something was up, we get a scene of Robin fighting nobody to spell out "Yes, Robin is crazy you dumb shit audience." In this situation it feels like the writers wanted us to immediately gravitate to one side, so they eliminated anything that could deliver some benefit of doubt, or keep us in suspense. Hyperbolic or not, that is good writing, because it allows the viewers to go beyond the intended experience an episode may have.

And, it's weird. The episode feels like it wanted to draw more on the mystery, but these extra clues were thrown in at the last minute, the scenes there and after would suggest so... but then one of the later scenes kill that thought before it could even see down the barrel. We're led, in theory, to be Robin has gone insane, but after Raven enter's Robin's head, it's confirmed he's telling the truth, just, keep in mind, people vouch for this series as one of many be all end all, great cartoons, and that makes this episode all the more insulting. Aren't we supposed to hate stupid shit in cartoons? I don't know what to believe anymore.

I do like how the realization is delivered through a punch in the face, at least symbolism is in good standing here.

So what's the deal here? Remember the giveaway I mentioned? This all began when Robin breathed in some dust that was on Slade's mask. Well, that dust happened to contain hallucinogenic material, and Slade would only appear before Robin in the dark... where Robin would feel every single hit landed on him... Okay you know what, screw the rest of the episode, you get one last lawl Beast Boy and a fakeout involving the mask which would've had potential, but everyone else was clearly too blind to see it.

After

I can forgive everything about this episode had they not worked so hard to establish the dynamic between Robin and Slade. There was an idea there, and they just gave up. It's like waiting in line for a roller coaster ride, you drum up the courage to wait in line, then by the time you get in front, you just chicken out.

Things Change was a dire episode, but I feel Haunted left me with a far worse feeling. It's one thing to completely miss an opportunity, it's another to throw in a half baked reason because either you're so afraid of putting your hero in a bad light, or you believed the audience couldn't handle it. You may say this was just for kids, no, don't give me that. The argument is often used to excuse dumb comedies, which I don't hate those shows, but as Teen Titans was poised as going above and beyond, what excuse does it have?

It's obvious, Robin finally cracks thanks to his ongoing obsession with Slade, he loses face with his team, we won't know for sure if Slade was actually out there or was gone for good with enough hints that won't conform either. Nah, let's have Robin trip balls and somehow get his ass kicked, now that's sophisticated writing, certainly justifies the praise this series gets on a regular basis.

The truth is, anyone can crack under pressure and become worse people for it. Rather than push for all perfect heroes, why not show that they're human like all of us? Or at least provide a good opportunity for a story? It could even lead to a satisfying defeat that sticks with you, or catch you by surprise and easily be fixed. The best examples of that lie with Chapel in Todd McFarlane's Spawn in Home, Bitter Home, where we see a badass killer broken beyond belief, and the Kookabarra in Koala Man, where the clues to his identity are subtle, and the surprise has some weight, and they managed to make a piss joke work with the right context.

But, I'm burying the lead here. Other DC cartoons had explored mental breakdowns, and a big example would be Batman: TAS' Baby Doll, where they're subtle about what's eating the main villain and fueling her obsession, and then it hits us hard by the end of it. There's The Batman's portrayal of Clayface, which of all things that series did, it was twisted in a good way, they certainly committed.. Oh, there's also Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker that sees Robin getting corrupted by the Joker, of course that is ruined by the fact that it turns out Joker planted a chip on Robin that would bring out the Joker personality.

Apparently there's some mandate in DC cartoons where Robin could never become twisted or evil unless there's a valid explanation and it's all just some form of mind control or hallucinogen. If it wasn't gonna happen, why spend so much time cultivating Robin and Slade's relationship if it would lead to something that would either be resolved by the end of an episode or two, why treat it like it has more weight than it would turn out to have? Anything that does happen, whether it be Robin serving Slade or becoming Red X is easily undone after some time. Slade dying is undone after some time. The apocalypse is undone after some time. It feels as though there's little meaning to anything that ever happened in the show, and I say it like that because, for the last time, it is heralded in such a way. If you give any idea that what happens is meaningless, you're left with limited mileage when you watch the episodes again.

At least with Avatar: The Last Airbender, the episodes were essentially a series of different chapters, happening in a certain order to build up to the conclusion of its three books. About the only things I'd still complain about that show is how empty Azula turned out to be as a villain and how they dropped the bombshell about Aang being the last airbender three episodes in when they could've dedicated the whole season to that and have him adjust to his role thereafter, show some more character building, more specifically, I want that as a benefit to that series.

The point behind that is to show events in that series weren't isolated or forgotten about thereafter, where Teen Titans could abandon certain elements at the drop of a hat. Nothing ever sticks to the characters in Teen Titans, as they would gradually or immediately slip back into their usual roles thereafter. Perhaps this is owed to it not being a straightforward action show.

Like, I get it, Teen Titans was made the way it was to capitalize on the growing popularity of anime in the states. A lot of anime series aren't always relegated to following one genre. However, it feels weird when Teen Titans does it, as if they just copied tropes and frameworks verbatim, with little thought to how a story would turn out. That isn't to say you should take my word on this, I could be right, I could be wrong, but this is just how I see the show.

The moments are there, but a lot of the time there isn't any real weight to them, sure, it feels like it but it doesn't really stick. Because Teen Titans is so well engrained in everyone's conscious, I think that contributed to the show's continued presence even years after it ended. They just took an idea and went with it without any thought to how they could go beyond set expectations.

I had gone on with this show without any idea what episode would best sum up my issues with it, but Haunted is a solid contender for representing what I consider to be wrong with this show. If they can't be bothered to put more into an ongoing hero-villain dynamic and just throw in a hokey reason to enable things to be undone by the end, it's a sign that they either don't care, or take viewers for chumps. And it gets to a point where you wonder if these more serious shows have people who genuinely want to tell a story or just seek to play to the crowd with little effort, and Teen Titans is far from the only show to give me that feeling.

Tuesday, July 4, 2023

The Best Christian Film

 Christian films get a bad rep. It seems no matter what, many attempts either turn out laughable or contemptible, from ultra low budgets to terrible ways of communicating a message, and not helping is the likes of Pure Flix poisoning the well. In the past, you had stuff like the Omega Code, Left Behind and Apocalypse, back when Kirk Cameron still had some dignity, and while those films have little to write home about, they have some appeal, B-movies that can switch things up from what is usually associated with films in those camps.

When it comes to Christian movies that can actually rise above and be considered good, some may immediately turn to The Passion of the Christ, which for the record was helmed by Mel Gibson, a religious man. However, I'm not gonna talk about that movie. Instead, I'm going to discuss a Christian film that's not only enjoyable, but also not incredibly condescending.

2002's Joshua.

Personal Background

As a kid, I went to what amounts to a Christian night school at my old local church, for some reason. It was mostly fun and games, and we even got to watch movies, but no Veggie Tails. I got to watch some weird 90s video I'm currently trying to find the name of, I watched Beginners Bible, which was made by the same company behind Doug, and I watched Joshua.

Clips of this movie are relatively scarce, but thanks to the nature of its release it made it easier to find on streaming, and by that I mean it's on Tubi.

Film Background

Joshua was a 2002 film directed by Jon Purdy, a man whose resume is rather dry, yet interesting. Prior to this he directed two sci-fi horror films. I say that to bring up some irony that has befell the independent film community. In the past we had some awkward family films helmed by directors who were prevalent in the horror and action community, no doubt due to money. I'm not saying Joshua is a victim of this, but I just find it funny how they got a man who worked on genres that are otherwise deemed reprehensible by non-seculars.

I'll give it this, a horror film where Jesus Christ comes down to smite sinners may be a beautiful disaster in the making.

The film was produced by Howard and Karen Baldwin, no relation to Adam Baldwin or the Baldwins. They were the founders of Crusader Entertainment, the film's principal production company and this being their first production. However, weirdly enough their first film would be produced under a non-secular subsidiary. Crusader would rebrand as Bristol Bay Productions in 2003, with their most notable production under that being a Ray Charles biopic, though technically Crusader's last film under that such name was 2005's A Sound of Thunder, and that was only because it was in production before the name change.

Joshua managed to bring in some decent star power. They landed actors like Tony Goldwyn and F. Murray Abraham. Goldywn isn't a major Christian, but ironically he is the president of The Samuel Goldywn Company, they released Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas for the record. F. Murray Abraham however is a relatively devout follower of Christ so I imagine he took immediate interest in the script. Abraham is perhaps known nowadays for appearing in Mythic Quest, only to get fired for sexual misconduct.

Say what you will about Kirk Cameron, at least sexual misconduct isn't a black mark on an already questionable rep.

As for other actors, we have Kurt Fuller, who was in quite a lot of stuff including Ghostbusters II, Wayne's World, Scary Movie, among a hell of a lot of others. There's also Colleen Camp because of her prevalence in a lot of films, those not necessarily Christian. Lastly, I bring up Giancarlo Giannini because they went the extra effort to have most scenes filmed in Rome and have an authentic Italian actor. 

The Film

Joshua follows this basic principle. What if Jesus walked amongst the mortals? The titular Joshua arrives in Auburn, a wood-working artist who would slowly integrate with the others through no divine intervention of his own. This is a display of how kindness and faith can help people through their lives, a simple principle of faith otherwise lost through more devout teachings that would otherwise make people fear god, and that is actually something addressed in this film.

Simply for being a big help to the people, Joshua begins to have a metaphorical hold on the people, best shown when he begins to try and reconstruct a church destroyed in a storm, and gets others to help. Of course there'd be no point without any conflict.

So take a guess, who do you think the villain is gonna be in this? A raging atheist straw-manned to hell and back? A misguided preacher who thinks wrong of Joshua for some reason? Or just someone who sees the worst based on some alarming coincidences?

In this case, it's one Father Tordone. He initially commissions Joshua to craft a wooden carving of St. Peter out of ash, but begins to feel alarmed when he sees that the townsfolk are gathering together to construct the church at Joshua's request, when there wasn't one. Something for nothing. What begins as suspicion, turns to fear as Joshua confronts a conman preacher and restores sight to a blind woman.

I'd like to take a moment to say how much I love this scene, rather than punish the conman, it's done in a compelling way to show what true faith is, and give us a sense of people seeking faith, which is why these cons tend to get good attendance, and of course it's not just a "Preacher man bad" thing like most stabs at religion.

Compounding Tordone's conundrum is a personal conflict with Father Pat, a rather eccentric priest who enjoys fishing and feels he could never live up to his role. He's an all-round likable character, not overdone to the point it feels like scenes with him take you out of anything. Pat begins to identify more with Joshua, and it culminates in him abandoning his role as Tordone holds an intervention against Joshua.

One thing about this intervention is that it shows Tordone's philosophy on god, that he is one to be feared on the grounds of sin. Whereas Joshua presents a more lax perspective, honing in on faith and kindness, and welcoming the spirit, basically saying there is little to fear, though it's something to be seen for itself.

Joshua is also not one to just immediately let dying souls go free, and perhaps this is a way to keep viewers from realizing he is meant to represent Jesus. This is shown when he revives a man whom he befriended earlier on after falling from 40 feet. Although this may also serve as a reason to have Joshua sent to the Vatican, which is what all of this would culminate in.

Tordone would realize that Joshua may in fact be Jesus, and is thus clear to meet the pope, moving him to tears in memories only Jesus may recount, Father Pat has finally earned the confidence he needed to engage with the church-goers, among other happy endings made possible with faith.

What Makes This Great?

The problem with Christian films is that they wear their messages on the sleeve. Many of them seek to paint non-believers as cartoonishly evil, be lazily done or incorporate sermons that more often than not deliberately try to drive people to a certain belief. It's clear these films only have one audience in mind, and they deliver to them for better or worse.

Joshua rises above those films through its simplicity. Referring back to the thesis, what if Jesus walked amongst the mortals? It doesn't seek to portray Jesus as absolutely perfect, but human, and just eager to help people through their problems. He doesn't actively punish or chastise people for how they practice their faith, at most being blunt about not knowing how.

I can understand people taking issue with the performance of miracles, but the point behind that is that those people have strong faith, and Joshua sees it within them, hence why he helps a blind woman visiting a conman's revival tent hoping to be relieved, and why he helps Theo, guy who fell, as he wanted to have the courage to act as a pastor, a good heart preaching the principles Joshua adheres to.

Many Christian films or ideologies portray God as someone or something to be feared, but Joshua believes that God should not be feared, for their hearts and kindness would make all the difference.

If that isn't your speed, we're left with a wholesome story that isn't as saccharine as others. Without the credits this is about less than 90 minutes so it doesn't overstay its welcome. There're some clever lines that aren't painful to listen, the characters, at least the main ones, are well realized and there is a true pay-off to everything.

Also we get a free performance from Third Day, Christian band.

If you have a good story to tell you can forgive the over Christian elements, and I feel this does a good job at that.

Final Thoughts

As a kid I didn't really understand this film, either that or I have to leave the room during more important scenes, but as an adult, I've grown to appreciate this film more and more. There was some genuine effort put into it, for sure.

If you're looking for a Christian film that isn't cheap garbage or by Pure Flix, I think Joshua will be a nice breath of fresh air for you.

It's on Tubi, so check it out while you can: https://tubitv.com/movies/304779/joshua

Wednesday, June 21, 2023

LTA: Primos

 Another day another controversial show is in the works. Primos. A new cartoon is coming to Disney Channel, and it somehow managed to piss nearly everyone off. But I’m not gonna focus on that. Is the series looking to be as bad as it seems? Probably not, short answer. Read on for the long one.

Primos is a series centering on the life of a Hispanic girl having to put up with her siblings, a huge amount of siblings. I know this may seem familiar to you, but that’s because it is. 

On the surface, Primos looks like another generic bean cartoon, one certain members of the cartoon community would latch onto because it has a young female lead, that’s not the case here…

But back on track, it seems like this is meant to be Disney’s answer to The Casagrandes, or The Loud House. Let’s face it, TV shows that have a large family, as in siblings, relatives, the like, aren’t as common as you think, especially as both of these have those reaching the double digits. They wanted something to get Nickelodeon’s audiences with, the creator of Primos just so happened to be the first to offer.

It seems this will be about a girl trying to make it through life but it is complicated by her siblings. Not helping with the Loud House parallels here.

It seems like Disney had little thought to how to handle a series with a predominantly Spanish cast of characters, I mean with stuff like Encanto they could give a shit, but it's clear representation is second to marketability, as they wanted a cute series they could push to said Loud House audience and get a similar following. It didn't work.

It doesn't work because Disney is handling it, and they seem to have a more cynical attitude toward representation, as in, doing it for the sake of doing it and getting relevance, why else is every instance of representation their first a lot of the time? I feel Primos personifies such cynicism, and does absolutely nothing with it.

If it were up to me, Primos would be a show about a girl falling out with her Spanish roots and is caught between two different cultures, trying to make the best of either. There is a lot more to this show, but I don't want to accidentally bury the lead here.

All I can say is that Primos looks like it's gonna bomb hard, not that the creatives are making things any better.

Monday, June 19, 2023

3 shows I was wrong about

Change is a part of life, no matter what Jordan Fringe may indirectly imply. All it takes is time. For a while now I had claimed I hated several shows I used to watch when I was younger, whether I was just spiting a community I wanted nothing to do with, or I just never bothered to actually watch the series again just to see if it's as bad as I remember. Since then, much has changed, and I'm gonna list three shows I've either become a fan of again, or I respect at the very least. It will go from least likely to watch to a filler spot to most likely.

Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi

When I first saw this show, I liked it alright. It didn't stand out to me but I tuned in anyhow. Because this show focuses on young females with a colorful style, it is inevitable that it attracts some interesting fans. BenTheLooney beckons. A lot of what I had to say about this show was based on a complete misunderstanding. I had assumed this was trying to be an anime attempting to mimic shows from the 60s, and I was especially harsh to the almost literal art direction taken for Ami and Yumi, and Julie, and Kaz for the most part.

Let's be real, Renegade Animation, company behind this, has initially stuck to a retro aesthetic with a majority of their shows and it's in full display here. I take it Ami, Yumi, and those other two losers took on the look they did for the sake of standing out from other characters, near as I could tell other characters from Japan in the show don't look this way so that's my best possible theory. They go for the most obvious anime tropisms because they wanted to stay true to this montra; "An anime done with the aesthetics of a classic cartoon, or something like that."

I can forgive the otherwise basic flash animation because either they just didn't have the budget to go further, or because it was entirely intentional for the retro aesthetic, and with that the plots would be simple to match. I guess if they had gone for more blatant Japanese elements then I question how well it would turn out, but at the end of the day, it's a cartoon series done in the vein of retro cartoons that just so happens to focus on a Japanese pop duo, if you like Puffy this is obviously up your alley.

Only things I don't like is how often the tides turn in favor of Ami, and even when it seems like she would learn otherwise things would go into her favor. I'm just saying, Yumi did something out of selflessness to help Ami achieve something wrought through selfishness. The other thing is that I don't like Grey DeLisle, hear her enough times and you're bound to get sick of her, her range is more limited than people are willing to admit.

I probably won't watch the series again, but I certainly have more respect for it now than I did before.

Ed, Edd n’ Eddy

So the Kankers prevail a few too many times and thus the entire series sucks, eh?

Yeah, I have no idea what I was thinking when I decided I hated the show. It stood the test of time, it was like no other Cartoon Network show when it came out, and it didn't take long for me to see that light again. I owe my negative feelings on it to the show's fifth season.

The fifth season, along with changing the setting for the most part and marking the show's shift to digital animation, marked some serious changes, and not for the better. Getting the smaller stuff out of the way, it feels like school for the most part was an afterthought, because they had to get Sarah and Jimmy in there somehow, and it seems less like they're amping up the comedic factor and more like they take a general idea and just roll with it with minimal thought, like mugging. I can forgive changes for the sake of switching things up every now and then, but any problem the previous seasons had are amped up to a considerable degree. I made a post talking about the fifth season a while back, so check it out if you wanna know more about what I thought.

While that season technically had the most terrible episodes, even what is considered to be the very worst in the series, it has its fans and I can't deny them it, but if you haven't seen the show in a while, please go in order, the fifth season could make or break your experience with it, take it from someone whose been there.

And it's not even the incorporation of a new setting, because that should be forgivable if the writing can justify it, I mean it's not as bad as someone suddenly coming into money, or a family having a new child (imagine the strokes they'd have if they learn about Andy Keaton), or getting a haircut, oh, and god forbid someone decides to lose some weight-

Yeah I've still yet to find a good reason to hate Disney's Doug, or Jordan Fringe is full of shit.

Camp Lazlo

Even I'm still surprised how quickly I got back into this.

Okay, in the past I wrote the show off as promoting toxic positivity and this being a sign Joe Murray was starting to regress... then I actually bothered to watch the show. My biggest hangup was the assumption Lazlo was ignorant as hell, but I was wrong. He's just very optimistic, and it's within reason most of the time. I was able to find context to scenes that put me off from watching the show again, and episodes I'd normally hate would become some of my favorites.

And it's funny, utterly funny. Rocko's Modern Life popularized adult innuendos in kids shows with the masses, and while Camp Lazlo is more straight-forward, there're still some glimpses of hidden adult jokes, good ones in general, a lot of it still got a laugh out of me as an adult, and the characters are all very likable. Episodes seemed annoying to me time ago, but when you give them enough thought, it'd be easy to understand why things turn out the way they do.

Also, I give mad props to Meat Man for committing to a very dark story.

This is number 1 because I've actually wound up seeing more episodes than I expected to, it's that good. There're still some episodes I would prefer not to see again, but that's something that goes for every show.

Conclusion

Sometimes it's worth it to go back to shows you initially hated, I know it was for me. Now, you may think this is a good opportunity for me to go for other shows I bash frequently... prepare for disappointment.

A lot of the other shows, I just have no good will for anymore. I want to avoid PowerPuff Girls like the plague, seriously fans of that show are nuts, you gotta draw the line when people whine about using a more familiar design indigenous with, you know, the main characters. Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends was the first show I recall hating...

And you already know where I stand with Teen Titans, if I feel I could dissect many of the episodes, there's no going back from it. And that's just going by shows I've actually seen in full. Let's be real, sad as it seems, there're just some shows we can never get back into.

I knew someone was gonna ask.

Saturday, June 10, 2023

Spawn Review

I'll be blunt, I don't have the best relationship with comic book cartoons. I'm able to appreciate some of them these days like the Incredible Hulk cartoons, but I feel a lot of them fall into the same series of tropes and cliches that basically make them as run of the mill as an animated sitcom, I feel like I'm the only one who noticed this. Now, comic book adaptations, familiarities aside, are enjoyable if you're into that scene, though it's hard to deny most of them have some serious issues. They could be forgivable if they came out at a time long before a gold standard is set like the old Marvel cartoons, but for stuff like She-Hulk Attorney at Law and DC Superhero Girls...

At your own risk.

But when it comes to shows like those, either I avoid it knowing I'd have little good to say about it, or I give it a shot after seeing some clips and I'll see how I feel about it from there, and here we are now.

Background

Spawn is a comic book character created by Image Comics co-founder Todd McFarlane, and one of many Image properties that received a hell of a lot of interest. In the mid-90s, Spawn received a massive marketing push, from video games, to toys, to movies and a television series, and for better or worse they saw the light of day. Though I imagine it was through marketing people became familiar with Spawn, I know I was.

My first exposure to Spawn was through a trailer for the 1997 film that turned up on an old VHS tape I had. I was unfamiliar with the character and assumed this was some B movie tribute, Spawn was a mutant and Clown was an evil wacky political figure or something. If you want my opinion on the film, I can understand why some things about it were changed compared to the comics, like changing Terry Fitzgerald's race and removing Chapel, but whether it was Todd's influence or not, it feels like people actually cared during its production, as nearly everything else is done to properly replicate elements of the comics, Michael Jai White did a good job as Spawn and John Leguizamo absolutely nailed Clown. You can certainly do a lot worse when it comes to superhero films, especially New Line Cinema titles released during that period. After all, 97 was the year of Annihilation.

As for the series it's another interesting coincidence. I left a comment praising the animation in the music video for Korn's Freak on a Leash, and I said yeah, I want to see a cartoon animated like this. Someone recommended Todd MacFarlane's Spawn to me, and after a few years I got around to checking it out... just to find context for a scene I saw on YouTube. Although going through it, it seemed more familiar than I expected, like I watched this long ago in reruns, or my folks actually let me watch it, I know they let me watch The Sopranos with them.

Let's just get into the series proper.

Plot and Characters

This won't be a plot summary, but just to get you into the loop, Spawn centers on Al Simmons, a government assassin who is betrayed by his partner and killed. He bargains with Satan stand-in Malebolgia in order to return to earth and reunite with his wife Wanda, but as his death was arson-based he is rendered disfigured, and now sent to recruit souls to join Malebolgia's army, in this case, souls of those who have done wrong and would be destined for hell.

This is made clear early on, so even if you haven't read the comics you can at least jump right in without needing that much knowledge of the character. An adaptation works best when you don't need to be immediately familiar with the initial source material. With so many adaptations taking on radically different directions with little connection to the sources that originated them, it's a huge mess.

However, that doesn't mean you'd be losing some context if you're new to the series, and it shows for a lot of the characters. I'm not aware of their allegiances, motivations or overall relevance to the plot, so admittedly I had to look them up so I have some idea to what to expect, especially when each are well written characters in their own right. Firstly, Angela. She had only made one appearance in the animated series proper. I had assumed she would be a bounty hunter sent to kill Spawn, and I was kinda right. At least somewhere in the comics she was initially sent by heaven to destroy Spawn, it fails but not on black and white terms. The role was kinda switched by the end of the series, where Jade was given the role. I heard this was due to legal issues between Todd and Neil Gaiman and if the latter had no role in the series that could've spelt trouble, although Angela would've appeared in the show's fourth season had the series kept going.

But when it comes to Spawn characters outside of those immediately connected to Spawn, I've gotta talk about Sam and Twitch. Now, on the surface they appear to either be corrupt cops or those who would become a thorn in Spawn's side, but basic research and getting through the series revealed that wasn't so. In truth, Sam and Twitch are poised as being good cops in a precinct riddled with corruption, that point being made especially clear in the show's last season, when beforehand they were just investigating incidents Spawn either had a hand in or happened to be at the right place at the right time for. People like to immediately depict cops as outright corrupt, whether it comments on police brutality or just pokes fun at them, so it's nice to see something not only serve as antithesis to that, but maintain its commentary on corruption in the police force. Even when said commentary is on the nose, it's at least relevant to the plot and key characters and carried out in a way that makes either character shine, from reflecting Sam's genuine care for justice beyond his more loutish nature, to Twitch's bravery, determination and analytical nature.

I certainly thought they were great, and so did everyone else. They not only got a cameo in the 1997 film, but they even got a spin-off comic series.

Clown, aka the Violator, marks the perfect balance between entertaining and sadistic, or just one who delights in fucking with people's minds. He was summoned to ensure Spawn kills those with souls to be damned to be recruited into Malebolgia's army. The film portrays him as more comedic but otherwise in line with his comic depiction, while the animated series is the latter in full force, either works for the material they are given. On the opposite extreme, Cogliostro, once the Black Knight who had managed to escape Malebolgia's grasp, seeks to help Spawn avoid a similar fate. Regretfully in the comics he becomes a villain, but hey as long as it wasn't so he could get into the pants of a deviantArt OC so be it. This seems to be a later occurrence in the comics so the animated series was spared from one of the most desperate attempts at drama since ever.

Of course there're people who're relevant to Spawn's former life as Al Simmons, and this series does not take those details for granted. He wants desperately to see his Wanda one last time and he takes the opportunities, only for her to be appropriately disturbed by what is now at his disposal. His best friend Terry married her and had a child, and though Spawn was appropriately angry that he got further than he did, he realized it wasn't out of malice and at least found closure on that. Spawn was even able to confront his physical killer, Chapel, and of course he wouldn't show any mercy, having him live with the guilt, but having the strength to not have his soul claimed by Malebolgia. Finally, Jason Wynn, basically the whole reason things fell into place. Spawn indirectly served as a key to unlocking Wynn's corrupt practices, including black market trading. Whenever he strikes, he sends others to do so and is determined to keep his conquests in check. However, after becoming severely burned from a mythical mask, apparently the unmade fourth season would've had him seek redemption... either apologizing to Spawn or trying to have his soul be made pure so he can go to heaven, though the latter seems to be the case as he feared his actions against Al Simmons would catch up to him.

The seasons can be summed up like this.

The first season exists to establish Spawn and his motivations, as well as him settling into Rat City, an alleyway serving as a sanctuary for the homeless, and one where a number of shady dealings take place no doubt thanks to Wynn and for the first season, Tony Twist, who is promptly dealt with after Spawn makes quick work of Overt-kill, whom Twist sends to deal with a stake in their affairs.

The second season sees Spawn confronting Chapel and Terry finding himself scrutinized by Wynn after learning of his black market dealings, while Spawn is seen as a protector of Rat City. This also sees the introduction of Washington Post reporter Lisa Wu, who is soon revealed to be Jade, which the third season would confirm. As for the third season, Spawn realizes he can no longer get back to his old life as Wanda outright rejects him out of pure fear, a series of events would help clear Terry and expose Wynn, Twitch would survive an attempted assassination by his and Sam's superior officer and confirm his connection to Wynn, Jade willingly gives up after discovering Spawn's humanity is stronger than prior hellspawns she was sent to kill, and by dying a warrior's death she can maintain a place in heaven, and the series ends with Spawn wanting his humanity back. To some, this seems like a bad end, but this can be seen a number of ways, like how he is willing to be dead, knowing he's now a burden to those he cares about and can never live the life that was yanked from him, while realizing those who have wronged him were dealt with

Acting

Keith David as Spawn is complicated, because it isn’t Keith David playing Spawn, just Keith David. All that changes role to role is the script and the direction. Play his Spawn with his Goliath (Gargoyles) and I’m sure you’d find some similarities. Of course that isn’t to say it’s a bad performance by any stretch, but I can’t say the voice is necessarily unique. About the only time it seemed sorta different was when he played Atlas in Teen Titans.

But to be fair, let's bring up another example of an actor who is well recognized for one role, even though it's a similar performance across the board. Lisa Ortiz is often considered to be the superior actor for Amy Rose. However, if you've seen other 4Kids dubs, you'd realize it's the same voice most of the time. But, that can be forgiven if the role suits a character better than others. Lisa is to Amy what Keith is to Spawn, and he gets it down solid, an emotionally broken man who is cold to the world and those who seek to harm him and those he cares about.

Then there's one of the more interesting actors for Tony Twist, interesting in that he's played by the same guy, James Keane, who played Mr. Green on Hey Arnold!, and I say it that way because Hey Arnold! came before Spawn's animated adaptation. Keane also played Sam in this show, so it turns out he has more range than I'd expect of him.

And there’s not a single piece of Tara Strong or Grey DeLisle to be heard, it’s a breath of fresh air. We do however get Kath Soucie, sure, I'm okay with that, I know little of her personal life and her voice isn't as obnoxiously stale and repetitive as Grey DeLisle's, and she isn't a raging bitch like Tara Strong. Bite me.

But that's not all. We got the voice of Mulan playing Jade, James Hong; guy from the Seinfeld episode The Chinese Restaurant doing a role, Jennifer Jason Leigh got to play a character one time too, and there's a rule that says if it exists, Eric Roberts has to lend his voice one time. Inherently, it's a mixture of actors either not entirely in the loop of traditional voice acting or already are, and it can work, I know it did here.

Layers

There is some hidden complexity within even the smallest of things. Take for instance Spawn's encounter with that bad cop in the fifth episode. He threatens Gareb, but his anger was due to the stress of seeing one of his right hand cops and others literally blown up by a deranged priest who turns out to be Clown. Of course you wouldn't root for the cop but you kinda understand what led him to go bad, even get some irony of Spawn making him a message board, and after getting killed by Clown he gets the message about Spawn's presence to Sam and Twitch. This actually helps to give more weight and motivation to later scenes, for instance, Twitch's encounter with Spawn. Spawn has already determined cops to be outright crooked, but Twitch manages to demonstrate a stronger moral compass, and bravery in the name of learning the truth, and Spawn returns the favor with a warning, which really is him being nice.

You can even see such strong motivations with the other characters. Wynn is a uniformly corrupt individual, but he fears for his life upon realizing what he had created in Spawn, and he becomes determined to destroy him to save his own ass. Clown can seem like a hardass, but it's kind of his job, he wants to make sure Spawn fulfills his obligations. Terry married Wanda, but he never meant to infringe on foreign territory, and Chapel seemed to express repressed guilt over killing Al, before it drove him insane. Then Sam and Twitch, throughout the entire series leading up to a hell of a finish, and of course Jade which not only put her through an arc but helped better establish Spawn's humanity.

A great show is more than the sum of its parts, and I feel Spawn went above and beyond in that regard. It's really something you have to see for yourself.

The Animation

I was directed to this series because I loved the animation in the Freak on a Leash video, and I was not disappointed here. The animation was produced in house at HBO, and they also worked on Hot City which came out around the same time. MadHouse are credited to producing the show's title sequence. MadHouse is a prevalent anime production company, but they've had a hand in some American productions. For instance, they produced the animation for the second season of Street Fighter: The Animated Series.

However, MadHouse merely served as a contractor for other companies. In the first season, animation was split between KoKo Enterprises, Sheen Production and Sung Production. Koko were involved in quite a bit, producing the animation for the first season of Static Shock, Superman The Animated Series and took on animation services for Men in Black: The Series after the first season. For the second season it looks like MadHouse took on a more direct role in animation production alongside DR Movie. DR Movie also happened to produce the animation for Men in Black: The Series, but also produced the third season for Avatar: The Last Airbender, episodes of The Batman including The Batman Vs. Dracula, one episode of Teen Titans, they helped produce the Death Tome segment in The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror XXXIII, DC Superhero Girls, Justice League/Unlimited, they did one episode of Street Fighter, Masters of the Universe: Revelation, oh, they even did Loonatics Unleashed and High Guardian Spice.

It's important I highlight the more anime type shows and lesser stuff to demonstrate how subtle their work is on a visual basis in Spawn, but soon.

Okay, back on track, the last season was handled through Mook Co., who produced the first season of Men in Black: The Series, Swat Katz: Radical Squadron and the Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films from Zombie Island to Cyber Chase. At first I thought they were the ones behind the entire series, but I was wrong.

With Todd McFarlane playing a major role in the series' development, either he'd have plenty of freedom to take advantage of, or he's just there to make people happy. Okay this isn't going anywhere, what I'm trying to say is that things are drawn and animated to act like a direct translation of the comics. It's a huge contrast to the overt anime aesthetics and overtones present in other comic book adaptations. Now, it seems like most comic book adaptations outsource their work to Japan or equivalent studios in Korea in order to better replicate the action, but somewhere along the line people cut the middleman and decided to bank on the growing popularity of anime in the states.

Or maybe I'm overthinking it.

Spawn's animation is great, but far from perfect. They tend to take shortcuts and reuse animations, but most shows do and they're not as blatant as say... The Real Ghostbusters in its twilight seasons. Of course it's of no hinderance to the constant action going on, it isn't too complex, but it isn't too simple either. The art design provides a gritty appearance that compliments Spawn quite nicely, if it was overtly anime-esque, it would lose its punch, its grit, and just be a faceless series.

Senseless Comparisons


In a way, I feel that Spawn set a good standard for comic book shows that seek to be dark, well Batman: TAS aside. There're a lot of shows I can compare Spawn with, so let's begin with another series adapted from an Image Comics series, Invincible.

The differences are night and day. Spawn employs a more grounded comic translated appearance, while Invincible embraces the anime schtick wholeheartedly. It feels like a Cartoon Network action show from the mid-late 2000s but with blood and cursing, and of course their brand of humor. It can be enjoyed on a surface level, but when someone comes along and does it better, it's hard to really deny that.

Take the introductions of Monster Girl there and Angela here. With the introduction of Angela, you get a quick hint to her hero appearance, and when she goes into the alley you expect her to show her powers, but she just uses melee and anything subtle. You’d expect her to go full hero, but they don’t play into it, all you’d expect is for those creeps to get their asses handed to them, just no way of knowing how.

With Monster Girl, it's like this. There's a character who looks like she doesn't belong there. She is provoked into showing her power, this has been done. Now, it can be done right, don't get me wrong. Take Fantastic Four: World's Greatest Heroes' introduction to She-Hulk in the sure. Yes, she is shown at the start of the episode, but you know who we don't see right away? Jennifer Walters. Hence, it's possible to be surprised by its reveal for those who haven't read the comics, and yeah, the series features somewhat different takes on existing Marvel characters so there is a chance to be surprised. Not to mention, they didn't mention her name, like Invincible did with Monster Girl, thus eliminating any sense of surprise and dragging it out to make it look like a huge reveal. I'm just saying.

Next up, let's resurrect an old punching bag of mine for some extra blows, Teen Titans. Spawn did an episode that tackled racism, but handled it in the best possible way, show, don't tell. You would think they would make it where Terry or Spawn are maligned for being African American, but no, they have a psychopath who kills African Americans for dark intent, and the racist motivation behind it isn't stated outright. This episode has enough faith in its viewers to let them connect the dots, whereas Teen Titans spoonfeeds the message, pussyfoots around directly focusing on those who would face prejudice, because Tamaranians don't exist, and above all, rather than take the opportunity to incorporate lore from the comics, they make up a character that exists solely to push the message.

And yes, Static Shock tackled racism direct, but they handled it better by committing to the kind of racism people are the most aware of, and I'm happy that episode is getting more and more recognition for it, while Troq isn't as much. Consider this a segway into the next section.

Getting Away With It

Spawn was able to get away with a lot of stuff, though some would argue it was because it aired on a premium cable network and at a time when kids would likely be asleep, midnight to be exact. That's a good argument, but I feel that any show, anywhere could get away with stuff, well, beyond overt gruesomeness and gratuity, whether it's premium or basic cable, network television or syndication. To better explain my point, let's refer to Stripperella, Static Shock and Swat Katz.

Stripperella aired on a basic cable channel, and if you didn't get the idea from the title, it's a show about a superhero who happens to be a stripper, and yes, that profession is shown full stop. In spite of that, there's more to the show than it. Stripperella feels like it's trying to pay tribute to silver age comic stories, or just parody the genre, or maybe Stan Lee was clearing his desk drawers, I dunno. What I'm trying to say is that they got away with showing T&A on basic cable, lest the copy I saw was sourced from a DVD, but hey, they were wiling. For syndication, let's turn to Swat Katz. This show got a way with quite a bit, especially for stuff I bashed Teen Titans for skimping on, like characters going insane for whatever reason, even death, with some gruesome killings shown, shadow or not. Now yes, syndication lacks the standards network television does, hence producers were able to get away with a hell of a lot more, but what about that network example? Networks are ones that crack down on no-no stuff the most often.

Well... Static Shock.

Racism focused episode aside, Static Shock went dark a decent amount of times, and they never held back for anything. They made it clear Virgil's mom died under harsh circumstances, they highlight her death and the impact on the family, they put one character in critical condition as a wake-up call for Virgil to take his heroic obligations seriously, the first episode featured a gang war, hell, need I remind you of Jimmy, where a gun is blatantly shown, well, again, in a straight up depiction of a potential school shooting, oh, need I forget how the weapon is fired and someone gets hurt, on network television.

But wait, isn't The WB technically a cable network, same with Cartoon Network, beyond Kids WB shows airing on WB affiliates in syndication? I mean Teen Titans was also in the same boat as Static Shock, but you could argue Static Shock did a hell of a lot more than Teen Titans did in highlighting serious issues, and above all committing to genuinely dark stories. I'd argue that Static Shock serves as a kids equivalent to Spawn for going above and beyond, showing writers genuinely cared about making engaging content, and Spawn just helped inspire me to see just how it could be done, or how it has been.

Now, if you really want to see the differences in impact an episode could have, compare Teen Titans' Haunted to Spawn's Home, Bitter Home.

Relationship

As far as how I feel about the show, I have the same relationship with it that I do with Koala Man. Both of them are great shows and vouching for their quality is a hill I'd be happy to die on. The issue is that I don't like to participate in discussions of either, because I know where they'd lead. Spawn got cancelled too soon, Koala Man was created by the same guy behind Smiling Friends, do the math. I still like the shows, but I know it can go south if I encounter the wrong people.

Not only did I bring up Koala Man for that, but because both represent the best of two sides of a superhero show. Koala Man is a well written comedy with glimpses of character complexity and motivations made clear, all in series about a man coping with his past and a midlife crisis, I guess. Meanwhile, Spawn is a well written horror drama with clever dialog helping to provide some relief every once in a while. Bringing back Teen Titans just to get this out, Koala Man is set in an absurdist world so you can take the weird things happening as a given and they let the jokes flow without resorting to tropisms to get a laugh out, and Spawn has every right to commit to more gruesome acts, both because of its midnight slot on a premium network and already being based on a gruesome comic book series.

I don't know how else to end this, so let's go on.

Do I Want to see More?

So, seeing what I've said, do I want Spawn to get another season? Well the answer to that, is no. I don't. You're probably confused, lest you've seen my philosophy before. The thing about continuing, what if the ending turns out to be a letdown? A journey is only as good as the destination, if the end sucks it will drag down the experience of the rest of the series because you know that’s how it will end and there is nothing you can do about it, Camp Lazlo and Star Vs. beckon. There's also the matter if one more season is gonna be enough, will people be fine with that, or will they just keep asking for more? Ask for an inch, but take a mile. And of course people can indirectly kill the good will in seeing things continue. I never want to see Infinity Train or Glitch Techs with how clingy people are to those.

Then there's the matter of unintentional cockiness, had with shows like Sonic SatAM and Teen Titans, where they immediately end with either a cliffhanger, or a downer, something to gaslight people into thinking they want more. My philosophy on television shows go like this, treat every season finale like it's your series finale, leave off on a note that you can pick up the pieces on or satisfying enough to accept, which is something Spawn did, by having Spawn reaffirm his want to be human. You may say he hardly evolved, I'd say you're confused. Spawn wanting his humanity suggests he knows he can't get his old life back, but also won't be the leader of Malebolja's army, he is willing to die, but we don't see it. It could've been worse.

Okay yes, there's the matter of Spawn impregnating Wanda with a child that would serve as a decider for the fate of the world, but it would take a long time before the baby would be able to make a conscious decision and act on it. There's another element to the fourth season, but I'm not gonna bring it up, knowing how people on Twitter would lose their minds and that's another series thoroughly ruined by total goons.

Final Thoughts

Spawn is an underrated gem, for sure, but given the climate of cartoon culture, maybe it's for the best not that many people know about it, let this be like a secluded spot a select few people know about, a well kept secret not tainted by idiots, like Mission Odyssey. 

I would say HBO turning away from animation after Spawn and Hot City concluded ironically predicted the state of HBO Max, but then you realize stuff like The Life and Times of Tim and The Ricky Gervais Show existed.