Thursday, January 7, 2021

Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends review

 Think my biggest problem is that when I say I won't do something, I do the exact opposite. Think it's best I explain. I made an off-the-cuff statement on Foster's on Twitter and deviantArt, and just assumed people would be like "Well I respect your opinion." But surprisingly, people seemed to agree with me in some regard. I'd wonder if this goes over well, but feedback is rare on my front.

Rambling

It should go without saying, but the mid-late 2000s was Cartoon Network's biggest dark period, and for perspective this embodies the Stuart Snyder and Jim Samples era, one who had his heart in the right place but couldn't justify it, the other who had as much foresight as MrEnter, but even Enter didn't cause a bomb scare.

Now, what made Cartoon Network so great at the time was that they were still in their infancy (when it came to original programs that is), Dexter's Laboratory was the second show on the network to gain any kind of traction (and I know about The Moxy Show) and back in the day, the era was dedicated to creator-driven programs, they'd let people put on whatever, and only cut back where need be done. Though you don't see me waxing praise over classic Cartoon Network, just know I do respect it, and I mainly dislike Powerpuff Girls because I'm no fan of Craig McCracken's style of humor. (hi Dan)

People say the downfall began when Samples was dismissed from Cartoon Network, but ever since CN's first rebrand since the checkerboard era, it led to one big tumor. As mentioned countless times, the people at Cartoon Network had no idea what to do in the mid-2000s, which is why this era was mainly dedicated to imports and direct-to-video holdovers, along with whatever still-running shows they had and their originals at this point.

The funny thing is, a stark majority of CN's shows from this era held up very poorly. Let's go over the list. People hardly talk about Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi and that show was tone deaf when it came to anime tropisms (to the point one character from it served as a representation of toxic weeaboos.), and made by a company who's work is on the low ebb on a financial basis.

My Gym Partner's a Monkey was borderline doomed from the start, and I only have one episode (comprising the A and B segments), I still like.

Camp Lazlo, no word on whether or not Joe Murray was paid to be on the network, but the show feels like it took everything Rocko's Modern Life did right, and did the exact opposite. Or maybe I'm just old?

Class of 3000... actually it's still good to this day. Funny how the one show that didn't last compared to the others manages to hold up.

ReAnimated. Yeah, this was during the Samples era. Thought Snyder directly wanted to compete with Nick and Disney? ReAnimated came out before that for the exact reason, and Snyder just wanted to at least see if it would improve ratings, even if the shows sucked.

Then there's Foster's Home For Imaginary Friends. I figured I'd get some people who say they like the show out of their like for McCracken, but people actually seem to agree the show held up poorly. So whatever I may say, I won't be alone.

Finally

I grew up in the era I blithered on about before, so I had seen this show plenty of times. My thoughts on it span to many shows of the time. I didn't have a strong opinion on them, I just watched them when they were on, unless of course I'm suckered in by promotions that lead us into thinking we'd be in for something kickass, only to get a bog-standard episode that often doesn't live up to the hype. This was a dime a dozen for Nickelodeon when it came to SpongeBob and iCarly.

Funny thing is, I kinda felt like I hated this show early on. Like, this was one of the first shows I recall that I outright began to hate. When episodes I saw that I hated came on, but I had no other channel to switch to, I often muted the TV.

It's pointless to go into the plot of the whole show as it follows a non-serialized premise. Just the escapades of a foster home for imaginary friends and the people who live in and come to visit there. So let's get into the one thing people stated they hated outright, the characters.

People have said that Bloo was their most hated character but... I'm about to blow your minds. The episodes I muted happened to be ones where Bloo got his comeuppance. I basically hate everybody, but I don't hate Bloo as much as everyone else. Maybe I'm all about "Don't stoop to their level.", who knows? This goes for a lot of shows with episodes like that for the record, and may very well have turned me into the troubled jackass I am today.

Many of the characters are the sum of their parts, going through arcs that are either expected or nullified by the next episode. This could be fine if you don't expect anything much from the characters, it worked in ChalkZone because one-note characters are otherwise pushed to the side. But there're so many one-note characters it's something, even Cheese which was Cartoon Network's mascot, one of many at the time is no exception to this rule. Duchess? Enough said.

I can't put it to words why I hate these characters, because I don't know what to say, but if I had to guess, Mac and Frankie were condescending at times annoyed me the most out of the show, smug and too eager to lay on some comeuppance. It doesn't have to be shown to exist, it's felt.

I will never get why Craig McCracken is adamant on not showing the faces of most characters. Is this trying to be philosophical when he does it to Mac's mom? Where she embodies moms the world over? There's no mystery to her, she is around for whatever extent she needs to be, and if my theory is true, what's the point of hiding Ms. Bellum's face for so long? She's a terrible character so it'd be no loss if she has an ugly face.

Let's be real, anyone who had tried to hide the faces of characters either abandoned them overtime because it proved to be pointless (i.e. Fairly Odd Parents, The Loud House, someone who did webcomics on here), or actually made a decent joke out of it (Cow and Chicken made it clear mom and dad didn't have any upper halves.)

This was common in classic cartoons, but it went down like that because they weren't the focal point to the story. If there is a point to it, I don't know what it is.

I guess the one character I hate the most out of all of them is Madame Foster. The cooky senile old lady characterization gets to me something fierce, and yeah, she is pretty one note too. Anything she does is just one other aspect to her cooky aspect, it gets even older than she is.

The episodes themselves are either forgettable or, for me at least, make you question your views on morality. The most fun I had with any episode was that one special centered on Wilt, otherwise I can do without anything else.

They say the last season jumped the shark, but I don't think I saw much of it.

Animation

The show utilizes a retro aesthetic. I'm mixed on this in general. I hate shows that use it which people liked (Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi and Foster's), but like it in shows that people don't care about (Yakkity Yak and Gerald McBoing Boing) I'd mention My Life as a Teenaged Robot but I'm currently in the middle with that.

This looks like hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi with a higher budget, not cheap enough to look crap, but not expensive enough to look fluid.

Overall

You learn a little something new every day. I learned that I'm less alone than I thought with my opinions on cartoons, and that there's a building stigma on Cartoon Network shows from this era. Maybe I can get away with a negative review of Camp Lazlo, but first, I'm not entirely done with Foster's. See you next episode.

Wednesday, January 6, 2021

Top 3 Worst Reviewers

 So, if some crappy videos weren't interesting enough for you, maybe you'd like to see my picks for the worst reviewers ever? Admittedly I'm doing this to make up for leaving someone deserving of making my previous list out, but it would've been an umbrellaed coverage... which I did two of in that list.

Before I begin, I'd like to make some side-notes. I won't be including MrEnter or Irate Gamer in this list. For the former, it's a given once you take all I said about Enter's hatedom into consideration. If he had continued with his old style from back in the day he would've made the list for sure. For Irate Gamer, even at his worst I still watched a good deal of his videos, and he is in a better spot now than he was back then (no matter what BatDanKnight has you believe.)

Second, on the off-chance people bring up that MoBros has improved, I know that. I even saw his SpongeBob revisits where he acknowledges fault in his original videos (even from the start.), he had improved for sure in terms of reviews. HOWEVER, his old videos still had a hand in molding the cartoon community for what it is now, so I don't blame the creator, just the videos.

So with that said, let's get into more of the same, but slightly different.

RowdyCMoore

He completely flew off the radar in my Worst Reviews list. I don't know where he would've landed, maybe right at the bottom since somehow his content wasn't as low-budget or damaging on an influential basis, then again, Rowdy's been damaged on an influential level.

Rowdy hosts TV Trash, to give you the review series proper. They used to be on Blip TV until that site went belly up, but fortunately his reviews are still up on Vimeo (if you're ever that curious.) I heard about him back when I used to post blogs on Manic-Expression (though it was well after his heyday). I got into several fights with him on Facebook on politics (though that was me popping up when it wasn't necessary.) But honestly given his content, it's not worth dwelling on.

Rowdy was one of many reviewers who took inspiration from Nostalgia Critic, and that influence shows heavily in his reviews. He goes after shows that few have talked about, which is good, but he's angry about them, which is bad. Think Linkara if he decided to just rip off the Nostalgia Critic wholesale.

There's no charm in these reviews, and the sentiment extends to its watchability. I could barely make it through one review I saw by him (The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer), and if you say anything, it's to be expected his other reviews play out similarly. Frankly, the Nostalgia Critic had a negative influence in hindsight, which is why saner reviewers tried to do their own thing or scale back. Those who don't... well I imagine they have to stuff reviews behind a paywall, and a dollar is too much to watch coverage of a film I already know about.

If you know who I'm talking about, that guy isn't so much bad, just stagnant at this point.

Marlyonama

Let's be real, PushingUpRoses is the only objectively good female reviewer on YouTube.

Marlyonama is interesting, in that she was one of the earliest female reviewers on YouTube, though it doesn't change the fact that her content is ass and a half. With or without a script, she is unbearable to listen to, any points she brings up are either lifted near-verbatim from other reviewers or are carried out in an over the top way (or at least tries to come off as such, the bad acting ruins that illusion.)

Not to mention, she's not necessarily the prettiest flower in the garden. She lashed out at one commentator who covered her Tentacolino review, even removing one review outright after another person commentated on it. It seems she hasn't improved much either. Frankly I have no idea how much better she is now. The few videos I saw of her basically ruined any hope of me changing my mind on her.

If you really wanna watch her videos, I suggest you check out commentaries made by RickyRay102 and Doodletones on her Tentacolino and FoodFight! reviews, because trust me, hearing other people tear them to shreds would be worth it.

TommyPezMaster

Yeah I know, but trust me, Tommy deserves the title more than anyone else. The first two reviewers here obviously took influence from the Nostalgia Critic, some worse than others. This time, Tommy took influence from MrEnter back when he was trash. But it seems Tommy took more notes from Enter's earlier Atrocity videos than his recent ones (at least that's the idea I got.)

For perspective, I couldn't make it through the one review I saw him post, I dreaded how many times I'd have to see a running gag where he inserts an anime intro whenever one character was about to speak. I have received testimonies which confirm he takes points almost verbatim from MrEnter, few can make sense of his points against many shows, along with various quirks with even his written reviews (comparing two entirely different shows to one another as his tagline for many of his IMDb reviews.), not to mention he likes Saberspark, the first reviewer you find when you just want to look up some crappy CGI movie from your childhood, and very likely sticks to easy targets.

Compared to every other reviewer I know of, how could Tommy not top them all?

Monday, January 4, 2021

ReAnimated review

The biggest problem with CN Real was a lack of foresight... okay and the shows sucked too, as someone who hates going with the majority a lot of the time, I will never defend CN Real. A bulk of the programs they showed were either forgettable or destined to become cringe when you revisit them as an adult. Even Nickcoms had more soul than these shows, even if Dan Schneider embodied them all (what am I saying? I hate all of them)

There's a big reason I'm bringing up CN Real. It was a can of worms that landed on CN's desk some time after the release of one certain TV movie. Plus, it turns out that one of CN Real's shows happened to be a television adaptation of this movie.

Background

You probably figured out what I was gonna say before I said it, but for the sake of context, er, bite your lips.

ReAnimated is a live-action/animated hybrid movie that came out on Cartoon Network in 2006. It was around this time Cartoon Network was starting to scramble when it came to their shows. While they kept up with new entries and still-running old shows, well, who in their right mind still likes Camp Lazlo? 

Cartoon Network wanted to keep things interesting, so from then they worked on acquiring broadcasting rights to various Canadian and French cartoons (Which is how we got Totally Spies, Code Lyoko, Robotboy, George of the Jungle, etc,), continuing with inherited properties from Kids WB (starting with Static Shock way back when, Teen Titans and Johnny Test), continuing to air Christmas specials regardless of quality (that's where I first saw Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer) and even direct-to-video movies were screened on the network.

Then came Nickelodeon, who along with their cartoons also aired sitcoms. Them doing so would guarantee they would get more than just kids to watch their network. While I can't confirm things when it comes to ratings, it seems Nickelodeon would've got more views regardless of quality due to them being able to air just about anything, while Cartoon Network stuck to their guns. 

So, in 2006, perhaps to open the gate for potential new program opportunities, ReAnimated made its debut. I'll get into the reactions soon, but first, trivia.

The film featured a roster of otherwise negligible actors, three of which being kid actors who were burned off a few years after this movie came out. Laughably, this and Out of Jimmy's Head were the high-points to one actor's career (Matt Knudsen who played Sonny.) Perhaps unsurprisingly, he had no notable acting roles after this movie came out. Only notable actor on here is Fred Willard, may he rest in peace.

Along with live action actors, we also have voice actors (appropriately), namely Paul Reubens, Ellen Greene, Tom Kenny and Brian Poeshn. I was close to assuming Jennifer Tilly appeared in this due to how similar one of the characters sounded to her, but this just means Tilly has strong priorities.

But, what do you get when you combine a live-action film that feels like a bootleg Thomas W. Lynch show (The Troop, 100 Deeds for Eddie McDowd, Catlin's Way, The Troop, Romeo!, etc.), with an animation studio that're starving for money? Don't answer that. Most of you may know, but for those coming in, I hate Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi. So it should be no surprise I have no glowing opinion for the studio that helped work on the film, Renegade Animation. I'll go into how badly their work meshes with all else in a bit, but for a preface, this was their second big project (well for Cartoon Network excluding an unrealized pilot from way back when.)

Appleday Studios is just a moniker for Turner Studios for the sake of going with the film.

So, reception.

Divisive can't possibly describe how this film went over, though people were more on about how Cartoon Network aired live action on their network. 10-11 year old me was easily suckered when it came to show promos, and when I saw it, well I didn't think much of it, such is the way with things I actually caught when they were new.

My one revisit as an adult came from MrEnter's review of it from way back when, and as an adult, I'd break my own mouse and/or space key because I'd have to pause the movie so many times just to catch my breath. I watched a lot of Nickelodeon sitcoms back in the day, so I have the stomach for surface level cringe, hell I wasn't harsh to Romeo! a show that started out as tween cringe before pulling a major 180 by the second season and even saw a handful of episodes only a few weeks ago.

When you make a man of low standards cringe, you deserve every bit of scorn and ire.

For perspective, I'd put this film on the same level as School Gyrls, in terms of how obnoxious and painful it is. How so? 90% of everything Enter said about it can be considered the truth about it, and this was during his lesser era. I may make the same points, and if they're verbatim, it's only because I couldn't find a better way to describe them.

So the movie

In my Hi Hi Puffy Ani Yumi review I criticized the show for using an art style that contrasted with is Japan-centric framework, it being only a small sum up of what anime is like (I mean come on, it's based on a Japanese band and has Japanese culture, you gotta commit much further than Jay Ward-centric hijinks)

Okay to the point, much like how that show went by a basic depiction of anime, this show went by a basic depiction of tween-sitcom life, workaholic mom, eccentric dad, down to Earth sister (punchline soon to be intended) and the awkward as hell younger boy who's woefully unpopular. The dad's his principal, but that's honestly meaningless, he feels like a dad who's in a mid-life crisis but is desperate to cling to his childhood. I mean I can forgive watching cartoons, I'd be a hypocrite for mocking him for that since cartoons are timeless, but he's the kind of idiot that lacks any nuance to it.

For now, the movie feels like a mix between Ned's Declassified School Survival guide and As Told by Ginger. The former shows through the film trying to be like a live-action cartoon, but while that managed to be funny more often than not, okay you get the point. But to be specific, it just amounts to characters being over the top, and some random things like animals popping up every now and again.

But on As Told by Ginger, and you may have already caught it if you've seen this and Enter's review, Jimmy (the boy blunder) is friends with Craig, and their friendship is similar to Ginger and Dodie's, where I question the faith of the latter two for each pair. Craig is desperate to be popular, like Dodie. Craig treats Jimmy as a springboard to get approval, like Dodie. Craig annoys the hell out of me, and did I mention Dodie sucks?

To drive the point home, I don't agree with the stigma of calling some characters assholes, so you have to really screw up to make me break that doctrine. And guess what? He's like Sam from Danny Phantom in that he fucks up the life of a so called friend, leading to the major plot.

Jimmy attends a field trip to Golly World (I mean I think that's what it's called), where they learn of a rumor that the brain of its founder, Milt Appleday, had been buried below one of the park's rides (and yes, this is meant to coincide with one certain Disney urban legend. The potential for that had worn thin since 9 times out of 10, it proves to be true in episodes that incorporate that plot.)

So, Jimmy is sent to retrieve the brain, at the behest of Craig who'd gladly send him to an organ harvesting cult, probably, and comes across our antagonist, Sonny Appleday. Once caught, Jimmy tries to get away and gets run over by a train. At least that'd be the most sensible thing to happen. Up until now the cartoon-esque scenes amounted to just over-the-top characters and things that occasionally happen. This is already pretty known, but for the sake of discussion, the slow movement of the train and the collision causes Jimmy to go flying, literally.

Nothing could've made it look good.

After that, the impact causes Jimmy to get hospitalized, and in need of a new brain. You'd think with that kind of accident the brain would be the least of anyone's worries? If it was head first he would've snapped his neck, hell, the impact would've paralyzed him. I'm looking too deep into this, but I just want to know the correlation between a new brain and falling hard onto concrete.

This could be going back into cartoon logic to go with the human cartoon business, but this could also be down to crappy writing, and a desperate attempt to get to the selling point of the film. The only brain the staff has access to is that of Milt's. It had been in one of the doctor's possessions for years, for some reason. So, with Milt's brain he is able to see things through Milt's perspective, namely the cartoons he had created.

For perspective, this is part of Milt's mind, but Jimmy still has his old memories. I don't know the ins and outs of how brains work, but I imagine they took more liberties than necessary.

Okay, let's take a break from this and discuss the quality of the animated bits.

You already know what I think of Renegade's style, but let me tell you, they make things worse. First off, the cartoons themselves, they try to replicate the theater shorts of old, but it just looks like a modern day cartoon made by someone well behind the curve. The cheap flash animation clashes heavily with the live-action bits, cheap green-screening galore. This really just exemplifies how cheap Renegade is, even with Unikitty, they never evolved.

So Sonny paid at least one thoughtful visit my heart goes out to him. He was offered rent, seeing Jimmy he perspired oh, what am I alluding to? That was meant to be a Morrissey reference.

Non cringe sum-up, Sonny finds Jimmy's house and manages to get in by renting a room. There we meet the rest of the family proper, along with My Dad the Dimstar, we meet Jimmy's mom, an astronaut and his sister, a thot who enjoys Shrek cosplaying. Actually no that would make more sense, she is an alien, like an all green, long antenna sporting alien. Some say she was the most tolerable character in the film, but she's just the typical middle-ground type character. I.e., bland and uninteresting.

So, after Craig makes it clear how lowly he views Jimmy, of the toons (which I fucked up and didn't name right away). Mickey and Minnie references Golly and Dolly, Goofy reference Crocco the Aligator, pun-spouting comedian number 5009 Tux (think Luan Loud but more cringe), and Tom and Jerry references Pickle and Prickle.

Call it a minor nitpick, but it seemed like the business with Golly and Milt was meant to be entirely based on Disney. Why else would you go the route of a Disneyland-type themepark, characters meant to be like Mickey and Minnie in terms of structure? The inclusion of Tom and Jerry type characters only gives me a worse perception on the movie's writing. Renegade had no clue on how anime works, the writers had no clue on consistency when it comes to a brand known the world over. Just saying.

Anyhow, seeing how pathetic Jimmy is, Golly opts to help Jimmy straighten himself out and stand up for himself, and it works. My mind blanks after this point, so let's discuss Jimmy's love interest... girl. Or Robin for the sake of following along.

Robin is... all but forgotten to me. Most I can say is that she's on good terms with Jimmy and his topper and has a dark secret... that she like Golly and cartoons in general. If you have to hide your interests for your own sake you are shallow by default. If you wear your interest on the sleeve that means you have nothing to hide. I'd rather be with someone that likes Adam Sandler than Citizen Kane because they'd have more character to them by default.

So anyway, blah blah bruh, we learn that Golly's popularity had been severed by Sonny years ago, yet apparently the theme park is still attracting visitors and past cartoons are shown, I dunno, cheap tickets and syndication?

Jimmy is assigned the new head of Appleday Studios (or Golly World, I dunno), due to him having the mind of Milt, which could keep them on the right direction. He invites his friends to play along in the studio, but becomes distant from them as he has to, shock and horror, honor his role. Hey, he made the right choice blowing Craig off, hurts donit?

This movie features ideas that'd be too complicated for the writers on board, they think tweens are idiots by default, I know it's funny coming from someone like me, but I get it, I just hate rubbing elbows with people like that. They could've done something like explore Milt potentially having a deteriorating mind and it leading Jimmy to doing something potentially fatal (they did have Milt eat flavored paint.) They could've explored Sonny's relationship with Milt and why Sonny became so crazy. You get to a point where you could piece together ideas that'd make the film at least somewhat more interesting. This didn't need to be a tween-com.

It culminates in Sonny tying Robin to the train tracks, just as a new attraction is unveiled which would kill her and cause Jimmy to lose his head so he could get the brain. But Jimmy isn't around as he decides to honor his stockholm syndrome and go to a party helmed by Craig. The choice is clear. To lose Craig is to gain what's important in life.

Jimmy winds up going to save Robin, and remember how I lumped this with School Gyrls? In that film they put in animated bits which suggest they had to cut corners to get the film out on time and cheaply? One scene in this movie gives me that vibe. The world suddenly turns animated and Jimmy charges for Robin, adorned in armor and aboard a steed.

Did they run out of time? Did they blow all their budget on that kick ass train accident scene? Only good thing about it is the animation here doesn't look as ugly as School Gyrls' animated bits, but both are still cheap as hell.

Anyway, Sonny goes through the same fate as his actor's career, Jimmy gets to the party and several years from now will go bankrupt due to him having to handle Craig's finances because he is that weak. Yeah, about that, Jimmy's more assertive nature was treated as a bad thing, so he is devolved back to his old self, well for the most part, he got with Robin (I believe.)

Final thoughts

ReAnimated was a failure on all fronts. It's not that they aired live action on a channel dedicated to cartoons, but that it was a crappy movie that'd make the average Schneider-com blush. All I got from it was more reasons to hate Renegade Animation. Needless to say, few of the actors went on to do much else. The lead actor, beyond a role in Wild Hogs had never done anything else, people seemed to really hate Craig to the point he didn't have another acting role until 2014 (though then again he's more into doing stunts and had landed spots in more prolific films with that.)

It's history, but this managed to get a TV spin-off on CN Real (though that was owed to them wanting to keep costs low as they focused on original content and didn't want to die on some ill-advised venture.) Apparently the staff hated Renegade's work, so they have no involvement in the show. Though they did get help from the guys behind That's So Raven and Even Stevens. Craig didn't appear in this, well the character did but not the actor. Don't ask me to review the show.

Honestly, the only way this movie could've worked is if it were some mid-late 90s horror film (intentional or non-intentional), where Jimmy gets the worst aspects of Milt and we get an idea on why he went belly up, Sonny had been mentally scarred by an abusive father (Milt), and Craig dies at the end.

Tell me that's no better.

Sunday, January 3, 2021

Worst Reviews Ever

It's easy to throw shit at reviewers nowadays, though it's becoming less common due to so many reviewers appealing more to familiarity and hemorrhaging for views rather than dishing out genuine opinions (with the amount of crappy CGI movies Saberspark covers, something tells me he helped make one years ago and is still proud of it.)

People can single out the personality behind the reviews, as the reviews themselves give us an idea on what someone is like behind the scenes, but sometimes a review can be just as shitty as they are, or they just fucked up at one point and it's hard to dismiss.

Er, fuck it, here're six reviews I find to be quite crappy, including some umbrellaed ones.

Marlyonama: Tentacolino

Starting off small, here's something a bit more obscure. Marlyonama is unique in that she's one of the few female reviewers on YouTube. But that's rendered meaningless due to the fact that her videos are cringe (I mean the more infamous ones anyhow.)

Marlyonama emerged around the time Nostalgia Critic did his review of Legend of the Titanic and refused to do the sequel. It was there that I discovered many new reviewers like WhyBoy and Bobsheaux, and while the former mostly evolved, the latter became stagnant. I mean it checks out, this review came out in 2012, and... it sucked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN9s_hZdxAg

It was below the par of other reviews from the time, and it got to the point a commentary was made on it by RickyRay102. Marly isn't the sweetest pot of honey on the shelf, as a matter of fact she's quite passive aggressive, as at one point she left a nice comment on the commentary, then did a negative reaction not long after.

For perspective, it wasn't just that one video, apparently a commentary was also done on her FoodFight! review, this time by DoodleTones, call that a preventative measure for a one-sided hatred claim.

BaseballSam1

BaseballSam1 was fairly known back in the day, and he still makes new videos though he is now off the radar. Once you see one BaseballSam video, you basically get the gist.

Sam had low production values, footage was recorded off of his phone. Plus he recycled opinions shared on other cartoons verbatim, each of his videos can be considered one in the same.

This guy is lower on the list because the one review I saw of him, the only reason I didn't make it all the way was because it was on Teen Titans Go. If I hated the show as much as everyone else I probably would've made it through.

Otherwise, this is to label all of Sam's crappier content to his old channel. His production has improved quite a bit since then, though I can't say how much else he had improved everywhere else.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkK4PiizZDA&t=156s

MrEnter: Da Boom Crew

On the off-chance you assume I'm blindly defending enter because I'm referring to many of his detractors as starting a new trend of A-Logs, I'm going by what Enter is now, not what he used to be. Enter's videos could be divided into four camps, his avatar videos where he appears when narration isn't needed, his original videos where he was just starting out (bored and uninteresting), his intro videos, where a bulk of his old cringe come from (these Animated Atrocities had the opening), and his episode title-card reviews (the ones with red and black title cards)

That era was where he started ramping up the anger, and I feel his review of Da Boom Crew at that point was the worst of it. In the past, I actually managed to get through Enter's older videos because I held a similar mindset to the people who watched him back then, but I couldn't make it through his Da Boom Crew review.

Let's get this out of the way, it gets repetitive real fast, and something tells me he hadn't tried to find the context in most of what's going on. Sad thing is, Da Boom Crew is a crappy show, but the review isn't any better. If Enter continued to make videos this way, I wouldn't have warmed up to him and I'd see things through the perspective of his detractors, but frankly he had improved since then, and everyone's stuck with minor hiccups and past follies, hoping and praying they could keep the hate-wagon alive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60ef8jQyw5k

Game Dude: Just About Anything

I don't hate the Irate Gamer. It seems many people have moved on from hating him, some even considering his videos welcome compared to where AVGN is now (and this is coming from someone who still watches AVGN). At worst, Chris isn't as honest when it comes to using CAMEO for his celebrity features, but that's about it.

If there's one AVGN clone I do hate however, it's Game Dude. People were so focused on how he ripped off the AVGN, that they practically missed the deeper parts of it, I mean Encyclopedia Dramatica did, and they're usually on the ball. To get you up to speed, Game Dude was a stalker who was actually taken to court for it, before fleeing the country afterwards (though it's rumored he had likely come back.)

While his production values were surprisingly decent, given that he was a film student (albeit one who would frequently re-edit his student projects, much like how he took down reviews that didn't obtain four stars or higher.), it didn't change the fact that his reviews were shitty and sucked ass. People said his Sonic 06 review was good, but then again any review of it is good just as long as you say how bad it is.

Jokes felt forced, he had a habit of shitting on newer adaptations of classic game icons in order to score appeal, plus he shat on lesser known games just for the hell of it. That's really all that could be said about him, everything he has ever done was shit. I couldn't even find a review worse than the others, so here's just a small taste

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f17C0K-FRgQ

2: MoBrosStudios' SpongeBob Reviews

MoBrosStudios' SpongeBob review videos have held up poorly for me. I remember watching them when they were new, back when all I had to worry about was school, he was also the guy who got me into YouTube Poops for a while, and cultivated a negative aspect of the cartoon community that persists to this very day.

Why do we have people militantly pining for the older episodes (at least a lot back then)? MoBrosStudios reaffirmed their importance by treating the later seasons like they were the worst thing ever (now yeah those seasons aren't up to par, frankly the more expressive later episodes make me sick), his projection reaches whining standards, and he's a reason MrEnter's older videos were so garbage.

MoBrosStudios, being one of the pioneers of more ambitious YTPs, had influence, and when it comes to SpongeBob SquarePants, he can bring anyone any way, and MrEnter seemed to be one of them. Well, not by much, just using a term coined by MoBros in his SpongeBob videos, what was it called? Squidward Torture Porn? Why did he call the writers by name in his reviews? Well MoBros did the same in his SpongeBob videos, particularly Aaron Springer.

The reason why I brought up how MoBros and Nostalgia Critic influenced Enter is because of those influences, Enter cultivated a personality that led people to hate him to this very day. Thanks to how he happened to be years ago, people will continue to use him as a means of boosting their own self-esteem. I'm not harping on MoBros, believe me I'm not, he has improved ten fold in terms of reviewing in his Anim8Ball videos, but his earlier content had done more harm than good in the long run.

At large, these videos feel immature in a way, trying to embellish aspects that were less awful and more just mindless. Not to mention, he takes SpongeBob continuity too seriously, well one time he did, he based SpongeBob and Sandy's karate prowess entirely on Karate Choppers. Not to mention, he placed Rodeo Daze as number two on one of his lists, when it was the least offensive of all the other episodes. One aspect? He was mad that the town didn't rally together to help. Thinking about that, I want so bad to see a show parody the whole town coming to help cliche by having them abandon important aspects just for the sake of one guy. It was a stupid episode, but there were plenty other episodes that deserved to rank at 2 in that list.

These reviews are the equivalent of Sonic 93's old rants, good for the time, but wound up doing more harm than good, though at least MoBros' old channel is still open.

Some of these videos are gone, so here's the first part of the one that started it all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUGXvBHmmEw

TommyPezmaster: Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs: The Series

We started with relative obscurity, we end with relative obscurity. TommyPezMaster isn't just a bad reviewer, but a sight to behold everywhere else. You won't find his reviews on YouTube, but they are on his Vimeo. Tommy strikes me as someone who'd shoot up a store in Canada (because he hates that country so much) and doesn't even know the meaning behind half of his inspirations.

All I got from him is that he hates CatDog and ChalkZone, two great shows, but his reasoning is poor. He assumes CatDog is reliant on toilet humor, and he hates Canadian-sounding guys, which accounts for coherence in his ChalkZone review. I tried to have an open mind when looking up his reviews, so I looked for a review on a show I hardly care about. Then came Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs. I wasn't a fan of the movie, so when it got a TV spin-off... I could've cared less, but it does look very bad, maybe I can focus less on a difference in opinion and just see how he goes on about it.

I stopped watching at the start of a gag where he would insert an anime intro when one character spoke. This felt like a parody of the old MrEnter, but he was desperate to make his own thing to. He claims something is mean spirited, but he doesn't put it to what happens in the episode he's covering, he claims to censor some aspects, but we don't know what (unless this was just him ripping something from another reviewer)

The scary thing is, I cut out after four to five minutes, there could be so much more wrong with the review that I don't know about. It's sad really, this looks like it could very well be a very crappy show, what with it being ugly and being on the lazy side when it comes to plots, not like Tommy'd be smart enough to point out something like that.

https://vimeo.com/207741668

Friday, January 1, 2021

DiResta review

What do you get when you cross a comedian who's getting his own TV show with a network that has become infamous for various low-quality sitcoms? You'd probably be asking who John DiResta is before you answer the other question.

UPN will go down in history as the biggest supplier of some of the worst sitcoms ever made. As UPN wasn't as big as, say, NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, even The WB when they're at their best, the network didn't uphold the same standards you'd expect. For the sake of finding a hit, they'd let people pitch just about anything. Did you know it was on UPN Dan Schneider created his first show? Seriously.

Aside from that we have various other sitcoms you had no idea existed. Let's see, Homeboys from Outer Space? Enough said. The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer? I couldn't even make it through one episode. Shasta McNasty? Well if you have the stomach for nu metal and live action cartoons you could make it through like I did. The Twilight Zone? Well it's no longer the worst adaptation, thanks a lot Jordan Peele.

At large, the only good thing about UPN was Dilbert, too bad at one point it was sandwiched between Shasta and today's subject. Between this and Shasta, at least the latter tried to be unique.

This was the television debut of comedian John DiResta, never heard of him? Neither did I. Beyond roles in Rules of Engagement and the two Miss Congeniality films, DiResta never really used much of his acting chops. He had mostly appeared in some reality shows alongside his brother Jimmy. He had the worst luck out of many celebrities who appear in sitcoms.

For perspective, Tom Papa had a sitcom that bombed after four episodes, and he's due for a movie this year. Hell, even though Emeril sucked, at least the eponymous star had a good fallback, though it seems to have killed its producer.

It seemed UPN had fair hopes for this show, it bled into promos with Dilbert and was even referenced through Guys Like Us (that Schneider-com), and true to their hopes, it was the lowest rated show of 1998. Not one of, THE lowest rated shows of 1998. The only things lower on that list were stuff from PAX's schedule (PAX was the predecessor to Ion Television), for perspective, PAX was more of an alternative to the raunchier side of primetime, and chances are those programs were reruns more than anything else. As something competing for primetime, DiResta is the bottom.

Here're the ratings for that year to give you an idea: https://nielsen_ratings.tripod.com/nielsen1.htm

As of now a bulk of the series (a 15 episode season) is lost. Hell, I wrote the show's page on the LostMediaWiki, save for one which was put up by YouTuber Panama Mike. Seeing it, no wonder it didn't catch on.

The Show

It's funny how Pauly Shore had the most realistic portrayal of himself in a sitcom about himself.

John DiResta is a transit cop in, take a wild guess? No seriously. New York. He's one of those atypical lawless schmoes who hurl one-liners and has to put up with his wife, annoying daughter and transexual baby boy.

Wow, this show wouldn't make it nowadays. They have a son named Dakota who dresses like a girl. They play it as an unfortunate gag for the record. This day and age it wouldn't fly, just saying.

Tell me if you heard these before, dad tries to pay for an expensive school membership fee, dad has to work late leading to problems, hard-ass boss, basically a chunk of the alphabet soup we call common. But any common premise could work with the right execution.

For a lack of a better word, this show is as by the numbers as you could imagine. It feels like King of Queens without any bite to it, and that show came out a month before DiResta.

Overall, already?

There isn't much that could be said about this show, which is why I tend to steer clear of sitcoms unless they're infamous enough to inspire interest.

This is a basic sitcom premise stripped down to its framework. It does little with the transit cop edge (feels like any other workplace comedy), I couldn't care less about the characters, and frankly I took nothing much away from this show. 

You know, it's telling how a show that rates so lowly could kill anyone's aspirations, especially since DiResta lacks a true identity. If you squint hard enough he can be passed off as Emeril.

Emeril supposedly got better as it went on, Come to Papa was better than what the one clip led people to believe, Shasta McNasty was wild and could be fun for people in the mood for that kind of stuff, The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer was apparently good enough to be referenced in Clerks: The Animated Series, Homeboys from Outer Space, I dunno, Baby Bob, a good concept with execution good enough to help me make it through the one episode I saw, Pauly, surprisingly managed to make it through the two episodes that are still available.

Either make do with a gimmick or give it your all with what you have. Otherwise you're left with nothing. UPN was a hive for garbage sitcoms, and I didn't need RowdyCMoore to tell me that.

All else I can say is that several years from now... John will kill himself.

Come to Papa review

In most of my reviews of obscure sitcoms nobody gives a crap about, I mentioned Come to Papa, a show that was supposedly incredibly bad, not to mention lost for several years. I used it as an idea that this would've been worse than some other sitcom I reviewed, I mean I don't know, when was the last time I ever talked about a sitcom?

Since then, half of the show's broadcast episodes had been found, one of which is on YouTube while the other is on MEGA. I'd like to give a shoutout to Panama Mike for uploading the first episode, thank you for helping us get an idea what many of these old sitcoms were like (and for saving the first episode of Pauly which I covered ages ago)

When it comes to sitcoms, they're more of the same, which is why I refrained from covering them unless they did something unique or are notable for the wrong reasons.

Background

Come to Papa was a star vehicle for comedian Tom Papa, who was fresh off of Saturday Night Live. The show debuted in 2004 and lasted for four episodes, because people absolutely hated it. People claimed it wasn't funny... and that was about it.

It got to a point where the show actually became lost, with the only evidence of it ever existing being a resume clip for Stacey Scowley. The out of context clip had molded everyone's opinion on the show based on available footage, and admittedly, it set my expectations very low. While I was looking up an episode of DiResta for my LostMediaWiki article on it, I found an episode of Pauly in my recommendations, and clicking on it, I found an episode of this show.

Is it as unfunny as they say?

The show centers on Tom Papa (as Tom Papa), using yourself as your own character doesn't bode well for me, if you frame your plot as an idealistic life (or you're so wasteful you try to cultivate your own little world.), but that's just me. Papa works as a writer for a newspaper in New Jersey, ran by Steve Carrell, pre-The Office, but more on that later.

The idea behind this is that Papa wants to break into more comedic writing, but is stuck at his work until he can find a breakthrough. With a limited premise, the sky's the limit, so points for not making shit complicated.

For the episode, Papa decides to write a commercial for a crazy car salesman, and the conflict comes when the latter accidentally burns down his business, but wants to take the fault to preserve his insane status. Fair enough, didn't run into that as much. I don't ordinarily laugh during sitcoms, but I actually managed to make it through the entire episode. It may not be funny, but it was watchable.

One thing I find neat about the show is how it handles transitions, it cuts to a pencil drawing Papa made detailing the context of what happened then and what would go on next. It gives the show a little extra character to it.

Now let's address the clip that gave any indication of this episode existing, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsKaFbs6698

In this, with a lack of context we have an unfunny show. But here's the context behind that. In the opening, Papa was sent to get coffee, but was half-awake and clumsily handed over money to the baristas. The baristas assume Tom was retarded, something that carries over the next few times they come by. This wasn't foregone, as it allowed Tom to get out of a court hearing regarding the salesman.

With context, we at least get justification for the laugh track, it brings the episode up from garbage to otherwise okay.

Another thing I like, while Carrell's better as Michael Scott, I did enjoy those bits on how he desperately wanted a cup of black coffee (relatable), and it seemed the world was against him as his servings included milk. The payoff was a coffee machine that did the same thing.

On the other hand, there was a gag involving a mailman who kept going in the house which had no payoff aside from something rather vague. I'm leaving it as indeterminate until I'm certain he's a recurring character.

Overall

While this sitcom isn't really a head-turner, it's better than what people may lead you to believe. It's harmless, better than other sitcoms I've seen, though I feel it was for the best it was canned early. If it had gone on, Steve Carrell wouldn't have been able to do The Office, and as James Spader proved, without Michael Scott, you have nothing.

If anything, Tom Papa had a better chance than John DiResta.

Why I Don't Like Danny Phantom (Addendum)

This wasn't brought up, but on the off-chance it does I feel I need to address it. What I'm expecting

"You just name-dropped some shows that had romance play a decent part in them, comparable to Star Vs. and Danny Phantom starting out."

And if so, okay, you got me there. For the sake of clarity, I'm gonna put reasons why I used those shows as examples against Danny Phantom.

The Loud House

It had Luna and Sam, plus Clyde's dads. One of them was eased into proper while the other just exists, which is a common trend for many male on male gay relationships in cartoons, the most complex they go is just a spark forming from the get-go. Okay that's the thing for female on female too, but for Luna and Sam, they obviously hung out a lot before then, so it had time to develop.

But at large, as The Loud House is more of a character-focused comedic affair, and Sam doesn't seem like the kind of person who'd send Luna to a life-changing demise.

That was my main focus when I made that analogy. On Lincoln and Ronnie Anne, they appealed to both sides by having RA beat Lincoln up after he tries to re-coup her supposed feelings at the advice of his sisters, the kiss supposedly getting a spark going, then things occurred naturally from there.

Gravity Falls

Dipper just has a young boy crush on Wendy, the two cops' relationship are played for comedy (at least that's how it went on at first), and Mabel unleashing Weirdmageddon had less to do with a date driving her to do it out of selfish desire, but Mabel did it by her own desire as her world crumbled around her, being manipulated by someone under the guise of one she knew and trusted.

ChalkZone

Rudy Tabootie and Penny Sanchez are established as liking each other a lot from the get-go, not counting the pilot shorts. From Rudy being incredibly interested in Penny right from her first appearance, to Penny going along with Rudy on whatever he does and the two playing off one another like good friends should, it works better than "Whoops, I changed your life forever, Imma go be myself, you gunna meet me in bed boo?"

Hey Arnold!

At best it was just playing off the "They're mean because they like you spiel.", at the very least they made it abundantly clear, but otherwise Helga and Arnold tolerated their own company from then. Funnily, Helga's expectations for their relationship was more realistic than Arnold's (surprisingly). Same principle as The Loud House, it's a character-driven comedy and the romantic spiel is just how life goes.

Ed, Edd n' Eddy

Enough said, romance plays no major part of it unless it's the point of an episode or a quick gag, and the Eds don't wind up with the Kankers by the end of it so that's one big bullet dodged.

Magical Girl Friendship Squad

Okay I threw that in to see if people would notice. This show fits what I like for more progressive shows. To have them be original ideas and from the start. If Daisy and Alex became a couple it wouldn't necessarily be out of place, they do work together and hang out together the most often.

Invader Zim

Enough said. ZaDr is a product of the darker side of the fandom, i.e., not part of the actual show proper.

Twelve Forever

If you'd call me on the namedrop, you'd say "You favorited a piece of Twelve Forever art that had Reggie and her girl crush Connelly on it. To that I say... I never made it that far. I just wanted to watch one episode to see if it'd inspire me to check more of the show out.

For context, the protagonist Reggie meets and develops a crush on a girl named Connelly, who holds a similar imagination to the former. Due to the show getting cut off so soon due to, you know, it was just something that was mostly explored but never fully solidified.

It's especially interesting since this show was co-helmed by a transsexual, the fact that we were eased into LGBT aspects by someone who would likely push for much grander representation is commendable.

But overall, it's a crush that could've been more, and Reggie didn't unintentionally seek to change Connelly's life forever.

So Overall

Hope this gives you a good idea on why I listed those shows as being better at handling romance than I felt Danny Phantom did.